Essential Supreme Court Decisions: Summaries of Leading Cases in U.S. Constituti

Description: Essential Supreme Court Decisions by John R. Vile The only reference guide to Supreme Court cases organized both topically and chronologically within chapters so that readers understand how cases fit into a historical context. Updated through the end of the 2021 Supreme Court session, this book remains and indispensable resou... FORMAT Paperback LANGUAGE English CONDITION Brand New Publisher Description The only reference guide to Supreme Court cases organized both topically and chronologically within chapters so that readers understand how cases fit into a historical context, the 18th edition has been updated with 20 new cases, including landmark decisions on such topics as campaign finance, Obamacare, gay marriage, the First Amendment, search and seizure, among others. Updated through the end of the 2021 Supreme Court session, this book remains and indispensable resource for undergraduate and law school students, lawyers, and everyone interested in our nations laws and Constitution. Author Biography John R. Vile is professor of political science at Middle Tennessee State University. He is the author or editor of numerous books on political science and constitutional law, including Encyclopedia of the First Amendment, The Encyclopedia of Constitutional Amendments, and A Companion to the U.S. Constitution and Its Amendments. Table of Contents Preface to the Eighteenth Edition AcknowledgmentsThis Is Our Supreme Court1 Article I: The Legislative Branch Powers CommerceGibbons v. Ogden (1824)Brown v. Maryland (1827) Cooley v. the Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia (1851)United States v. E. C. Knight Co. (1895)In re Debs (1895)Champion v. Ames (1903)The Shreveport Case (1914)Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918)Stafford v. Wallace (1922)Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority (1936)West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish (1937)[United States v. Carolene Products Company (1938)]* [United States v. F. W. Darby Lumber Co. (1941)] Wickard v. Filburn (1942)United States v. Southeastern Underwriters Association (1944)Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States (1964)United States v. Lopez (1995)Jones v. United States (2000)[United States v. Morrison (2000)] Gonzales v. Raich (2005)[National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebilius (2012)]Taylor v. United States (2016)Delegation of PowersJ. W. Hampton, Jr. & Co. v. United States (1928) Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan (1935)Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States (1935) United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. (1936)Mistretta v. United States (1989)Implied PowersMcCulloch v. Maryland (1819) McGrain v. Daugherty (1927) Watkins v. United States (1957) Barenblatt v. United States (1959) Taxing/Spending and Regulatory PowersHylton v. United States (1796)Collector v. Day (1871) Legal Tender Cases (1871)Pollock v. Farmers Loan and Trust Co. (1895)McCray v. United States (1904) Swift and Co. v. United States (1905) Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States (1910)Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. (1922)United States v. Butler (1936)Steward Machine Co. v. Davis (1937)National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation (1937)Graves v. New York ex rel. OKeefe (1939)Mulford v. Smith (1939) South Dakota v. Dole (1987) National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012) National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning (2014)King v. Burwell (2015)Michigan v. EPA (2015) Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2020)Privileges and Terms of MembersPowell v. McCormack (1969)Gravel v. United States (1972)U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton (1995) 2 Article II: The Executive BranchPowersMartin v. Mott (1827)Ex parte Merryman (1861) Mississippi v. Johnson (1867)In re Neagle (1890)Myers v. United States (1926)Ex parte Grossman (1925)Rathbun, Humphreys Executor v. United States (1935)Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952)Dames and Moore v. Regan (1981)Haig v. Agee (1981)Trump v. Hawaii (2018)Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California (2020)Privileges and LimitationsUnited States v. Nixon (1974)Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982)Clinton v. Jones (1997)Trump v. Vance (2020)3 Articles I and II: Distinct Yet Overlapping PowersSeparation of Powers IssuesUnited States v. Lovett (1946)Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha (1983)Bowsher v. Snyar (1986)Morrison v. Olson (1988) Clinton v. City of New York (1998)Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (2010) Treaties and Executive AgreementsMissouri v. Holland (1920)United States v. Belmont (1937)Goldwater v. Carter (1979)Zivotofsky v. Kerry (2015)War-Making PowersThe Prize Cases (1863)Ex parte Milligan (1866)Selective Draft Law Cases (1918)Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co. (1919)Ex parte Quirin (1942)Korematsu v. United States (1944)Woods v. Cloyd W. Miller Co. (1948)Johnson v. Eisentrager (1950)[Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952)]Rostker v. Goldberg (1981) Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004)Rasul v. Bush (2004)Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006)Boudmediene v. Bush (2008)4 Article III: The Judicial BranchJudicial Jurisdiction and StandingMarbury v. Madison (1803)Martin v. Hunters Lessee (1816)Cohens v. Virginia (1821)Eakin v. Raub (1825)Ableman v. Booth (1859)Ex parte McCardle (1869)Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Mellon (Frothingham v. Mellon) (1923) Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins (1938) Cooper v. Aaron (1958)Flast v. Cohen (1968)Stone v. Powell (1976) Elk Grove v. Newdow (2004)Uzuegbunun v. Preczewski (2021)Political Questions DoctrineLuther v. Borden (1849)Muskrat v. United States (1911) [Coleman v. Miller (1939)]Baker v. Carr (1962) [Powell v. McCormack (1969)]Nixon v. United States (1993)Rucho v. Common Cause (2019)5 Articles IV and VI: FederalismEleventh Amendment and Sovereign Immunity of StatesHans v. Louisiana (1890)Monaco v. Mississippi (1934)Alden v. Maine (1999)Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents (2000)University of Alabama Board of Trustees v. Garrett (2001)Lapides v. Board of Regents of University of Georgia (2002)Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina State Ports Authority (2002) Penneast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey (2021) Federal PreemptionSouthern Pacific Co. v. Arizona (1945)Pennsylvania v. Nelson (1956)Sprietsman v. Mercury Marine (2002)Judicial Jurisdiction over StatesChisholm v. Georgia (1793) [Cohens v. Virginia (1821)]Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831)Worcester v. Georgia (1832)Puerto Rico v. Branstad (1987)Limits on the States[McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)]Leisy v. Hardin (1890)Edwards v. California (1941)Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. Town of Harrison (1997) Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council (2000) Cook v. Gralike (2001)Smith v. Doe (2003) [Gonzales v. Raich (2005)]Limits on Federal Regulation of StatesNew York v. United States (1992) [United States v. Lopez (1995)]Printz v. United States, Mack v. United States (1997)United States v. Morrison (2000) Status of the StatesTexas v. White (1869) [Slaughterhouse Cases (1873)] Coyle v. Smith (1911)Tenth Amendment and State Police PowersUnited States v. F. W. Darby Lumber Co. (1941)National League of Cities v. Usery (1976)Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wyoming (1983)Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (1985)Arizona v. United States (2012)6 Articles V and VII: Constitutional Amending Process and Ratification of the ConstitutionThe Amending ProcessHollingsworth v. Virginia (1798)National Prohibition Cases (1920)Hawke v. Smith (1920)Dillon v. Gloss (1921)Coleman v. Miller (1939)7 Property RightsContract Clause (Article 1, Section 10)Calder v. Bull (1798)Fletcher v. Peck (1810)Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819) Charles River Bridge Co. v. Warren River Bridge (1837)Stone v. Mississippi (1880)Home Building and Loan Association v. Blaisdell (1934)United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey (1977)Due Process (Economic) and Freedom of Contract (Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments)Slaughterhouse Cases (1873) Munn v. Illinois (1877)Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company (1886)Holden v. Hardy (1898)Lochner v. New York (1905)Muller v. Oregon (1908)Bunting v. Oregon (1917)Adkins v. Childrens Hospital (1923)Nebbia v. New York (1934)[West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish (1937)]Lincoln Federal Labor Union No. 19129, et al., v. Northwestern Iron and Metal Co., et al. (1949) BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore (1996)State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company v. Campbell (2003)Takings Clause (Fifth Amendment)Village of Euclid, Ohio, v. Ambler Realty Co. (1926)Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff (1984) Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994)Kelo v. City of New London (2005)Horne v. Department of Agriculture (2015) Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (2021)8 The Bill of Rights and Its Application to the StatesIncorporationBarron v. Baltimore (1833)Gitlow v. New York (1925)Palko v. Connecticut (1937)United States v. Carolene Products Co. (1938)Adamson v. California (1947)Rochin v. California (1952) [Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)] [Duncan v. Louisiana (1968)] [McDonald v. Chicago (2010)][Ramos v. Louisiana (2020)]9 First Amendment: Religious RightsEstablishment ClauseSchool-Related CasesEverson v. Board of Education of Ewing Township (1947)Zorach v. Clauson (1952)Engel et al. v. Vitale et al. (1962)Abington School District v. Schempp (1963)Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)Stone v. Graham (1980)Widmar v. Vincent (1981)Wallace v. Jaffree (1985)Edwards v. Aguillard (1987)Lee v. Weisman (1992)Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District (1993)Agostini v. Felton (1997)Santa Fe School District v. Doe (2000)Good News Club v. Milford Central School (2001)Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002)[Elk Grove v. Newdow (2004)]Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC (2012)Religious Displays[Stone v. Graham (1980)]Lynch v. Donnelly (1984)Van Orden v. Perry (2005)Salazar v. Buono (2010)American Legon v. American Humanist Association (2019)Prayers at Governmental MeetingsMarsh v. Chambers (1983)Free Exercise ClauseReynolds v. United States (1879)Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940)Marsh v. Alabama (1946)Welsh v. United States (1970)Goldman v. Weinberger (1986)Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith (1990)Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah (1993)Rosenberger v. University of Virginia (1995) [City of Boerne v. Flores (1997)]Gonzales v. Centro Espirita (2006)Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014) Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer (2017) Masterpiece Cakeshop, LTD v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018)Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo (2020) Fulton v. City Philadelphia (2021)[Uzuegbunun v. Preczewski (2021)]10 First Amendment: Political RightsAssociation [Implied], Assembly, and PetitionDeJonge v. Oregon (1937)Hague v. Congress of Industrial Organizations (1939)NAACP v. Alabama (1958)Branti v. Finkel (1980)Board of Directors of Rotary International v. Rotary Club of Duarte (1987) Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston (1995) Rumsfeld v. Forum (2006)PressAbrams v. United States (1919)Near v. Minnesota ex rel. Olson (1931)New York Times Company v. Sullivan (1964)New York Times Company v. United States (1971)Branzburg v. Hayes (1972)Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart (1976)Gannett Co. v. DePasquale (1979)Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Commonwealth of Virginia (1980)Chandler and Granger v. Florida Review Essential Supreme Court Decisions remains the most comprehensive single collection of the Courts decisions. As with earlier editions, it is indispensable for the study of the work of the Supreme Court. Decisions are organized by constitutional articles, the Bill of Rights, and amendments. Essential.The beauty of Essential Supreme Court Decisions is in how easy it is to read, how comprehensive the coverage, and how scholarly and balanced the treatment of the decisions are.The longevity of Professor Viles book attests to both its quality and utility. It is an excellent compilation organized in a uniquely valuable manner. Succinctly summarizing each of the seminal cases in terms of the facts, question, decision and reasoning is very useful as both a teaching tool and for quick reference. It is easy to understand its popularity. Long Description The only reference guide to Supreme Court cases organized both topically and chronologically within chapters so that readers understand how cases fit into a historical context, the 18th edition has been updated with 20 new cases, including landmark decisions on such topics as campaign finance, Obamacare, gay marriage, the First Amendment, search and seizure, among others. Updated through the end of the 2021 Supreme Court session, this book remains and indispensable resource for undergraduate and law school students, lawyers, and everyone interested in our nations laws and Constitution. Review Text Essential Supreme Court Decisions remains the most comprehensive single collection of the Courts decisions. As with earlier editions, it is indispensable for the study of the work of the Supreme Court. Decisions are organized by constitutional articles, the Bill of Rights, and amendments. Essential. Details ISBN1538164760 Author John R. Vile Short Title Essential Supreme Court Decisions Language English Year 2022 Edition 18th ISBN-10 1538164760 ISBN-13 9781538164761 Format Paperback Publisher Rowman & Littlefield Audience Age 18-22 Imprint Rowman & Littlefield Place of Publication Lanham, MD Country of Publication United States Pages 662 NZ Release Date 2022-02-03 US Release Date 2022-02-03 Publication Date 2022-02-03 UK Release Date 2022-02-03 Edition Description Eighteenth Edition Subtitle Summaries of Leading Cases in U.S. Constitutional Law DEWEY 342.7300264 Audience Tertiary & Higher Education AU Release Date 2022-02-02 We've got this At The Nile, if you're looking for it, we've got it. With fast shipping, low prices, friendly service and well over a million items - you're bound to find what you want, at a price you'll love! TheNile_Item_ID:158582754;

Price: 111.76 AUD

Location: Melbourne

End Time: 2024-12-15T03:27:54.000Z

Shipping Cost: 0 AUD